Skip to content
The People’s Manifesto2029
Principles & discussion rules

Share

Text size

For reform and problem text, discussions and the rules. Saved in this browser.

Theme

Read in your language

Translated from English with AI. The English text is the official version.

Open problems

383 problems · 35 states

Contents
Explore

All India44

Andaman and Nicobar Islands2

Andhra Pradesh18

Arunachal Pradesh5

Assam14

Bihar7

Chandigarh3

Chhattisgarh4

Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu4

Delhi10

Goa7

Gujarat4

Haryana4

Himachal Pradesh4

Jammu and Kashmir3

Jharkhand6

Karnataka20

Kerala18

Lakshadweep4

Madhya Pradesh5

Maharashtra23

Manipur3

Meghalaya4

Mizoram3

Nagaland2

Odisha6

Puducherry6

Punjab16

Rajasthan5

Sikkim4

Tamil Nadu32

Telangana16

Tripura6

Uttar Pradesh50

Uttarakhand10

West Bengal11

Contracts that reward the cheapest bid

Open problems · Governance & corruption

Contracts that reward the cheapest bid

Most public works in India go to the lowest bidder, and a contractor's record rarely follows it to the next tender. Many countries score bids on quality and lifetime cost, rate each contractor's past work and keep one national list of banned firms.

All India
Support0

Share

Discussion

Open for ideas, evidence and questions.

What we know

India's General Financial Rules make the lowest technically qualified bid (L1) the default for public works. Scoring bids on quality and cost together (QCBS) is allowed, but it is used mostly for consultants. The NHAI asks for extra performance security when a bid comes in more than 10% below the estimate. Blacklisting is mostly decided department by department, and there is no public national record of how each contractor's work held up.

Other countries do it differently:

  • European Union: contracts go to the "most economically advantageous tender", which weighs quality and life-cycle cost (Directive 2014/24/EU). An abnormally low bid must be explained and can be rejected.
  • United Kingdom: the Procurement Act 2023, in force since February 2025, keeps a central debarment list and requires published performance indicators for contracts over £5 million.
  • United States: federal agencies must weigh a bidder's past performance, recorded in a national rating system (CPARS). Under the False Claims Act, insiders who expose fraud against the government receive 15–30% of the money recovered.
  • South Korea and Ukraine: South Korea has run all public procurement online through KONEPS since 2002. Ukraine's ProZorro (2016) publishes every tender, bid and contract as open data that anyone can check.
  • Performance-based road contracts: used in Australia, New Zealand and parts of Latin America, they pay a contractor to keep a road at set standards for several years rather than to build it once.

Corruption has not disappeared in those countries. Quebec's Charbonneau Commission (2011–15) found collusion and kickbacks in construction contracts. What differs is how often it is caught, and how quickly.

Open questions

  1. Which department in your state blacklisted a contractor last, and is that firm still winning work elsewhere?
  2. How far below the official estimate do winning road bids in your district come in, and what happens to quality when they do?
  3. Could your state's PWD pay contractors by measured quality, with deductions when tests show thinner or weaker layers?
  4. What would an Indian ProZorro need, and which state could try it first?
  5. Should someone who exposes fraud in a public contract get a share of the money recovered, as in the US?
  6. What would a five-year, pay-for-condition road contract cost compared with building and repairing the same road?

Sources

Discussion

Loading discussion…